Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 17.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006 Jul 12;17(4):422–430. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.06.015

Table 1.

Comparison of ChIP-chip, DamID, and PBM technologies.

Inline graphic Technology Advantages Disadvantages

ChIP-chip
  • in vivo

  • provides a snapshot of DNA interactions in a given cell type, under the examined cellular conditions

  • use of modification-specific antibodies permits the identification of genomic sites associated with a protein of a particular post-translational modification

  • identifies genomic sites associated either directly or indirectly (via protein-protein interactions) with the protein

  • typically requires a gene-specific antibody, which may be a challenge to obtain

  • to obtain enrichment of bound fragments, experiments must be performed in cellular conditions under which the protein of interest is expressed, nuclear, and regulating its target genes

  • might require potentially limiting tissue source

  • even with the use of densely tiled oligonucleotide arrays, difficulties in reducing size of immunoprecipitated DNA fragments limit resolution of DNA binding site identification


DamID
  • in vivo

  • provides a snapshot of DNA interactions in a given cell type, under the examined cellular conditions

  • does not require a gene-specific antibody

  • could identify genomic sites associated either directly or indirectly (via protein-protein interactions) with the protein

  • requires slight over-expression of the protein because of expression of the fusion protein

  • fusion protein might not exhibit same binding properties as endogenous protein

  • to obtain enrichment of bound fragments, experiments must be performed in cellular conditions under which the protein of interest is expressed, nuclear, and regulating its target genes

  • currently does not permit direct identification of genomic sites associated with a protein of a particular post-translational modification

  • might require potentially limiting tissue source

  • resolution has been limited so far to ∼1 kb due to methylation spreading


PBM
  • does not require a gene-specific antibody

  • highly rapid

  • provides a comprehensive survey of DNA binding site sequence variants, including data on non-binding sequences

  • can have very high binding site resolution, down to the exact binding site sequence variant

  • in vitro

  • experiments are performed typically at arbitrary protein concentrations, in an arbitrary buffer

  • requires analyses of additional data types, such as phylogenetic sequence conservation and gene expression data, in order to identify which sites are likely to be utilized in vivo

  • binding may not correspond to endogenous binding because of missing cofactors or chromatin context