Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 17.
Published in final edited form as: Langmuir. 2007 May 9;23(12):6827–6834. doi: 10.1021/la700328r

Table 3.

Signal Suppression (%) Obtained with Longer and Bulkier Targets.

Data
target		 ST-25 FC-22 FC-27 ML-28 ML-38
binding
schemea 		graphic file with name nihms101182t4.jpg graphic file with name nihms101182t5.jpg graphic file with name nihms101182t6.jpg graphic file with name nihms101182t7.jpg graphic file with name nihms101182t8.jpg
high
densityb 		71 ± 1 83 ± 1 88 ± 1 72 ± 1 85 ± 2c
medium
density		 31 ± 2 67 ± 7 84 ± 3 46 ± 3 97 ± 3
low
density		 42 ± 3 71 ± 4 76 ± 3 57 ± 4 78 ± 4
a

See Table 1 for sequences.

b

Percent values of signal suppression as a result of target hybridization are the average and standard deviation of measurements performed with four independent sensors.

c

After the 5 h equilibration time employed here, the signal suppression is not complete. All other measurements reflect equilibrated sensors.