Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2009 May 28;45(3):487–492. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.05.019

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Histograms showing the distribution of cavity surface size for three different image resolutions (identified by in-plane pixel size). Cavities observed in 0.7 μm and 1.4 μm images showed a similar size distribution, while cavities observed in lower resolution images (2.8 μm shown here) were less numerous and were larger in surface size.