Table 3.
Parameter |
SE |
ta |
95% CI (lower, upper) |
η2 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | DV1 | DV2 | DV3 | DV1 | DV2 | DV3 | DV1 | DV2 | DV3 | DV1 | DV2 | DV3 | DV1 | DV2 | DV3 |
CML vs. DAU at T1 | −0.23 | 0.27 | 2.1 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 1.2 | −0.47 | 0.73 | 1.7 | −1.2, 0.76 | −0.5, 1.0 | −0.3, 4.4 | .00 | .01 | .05 |
CML vs. CML-ND at T1 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.39 | 1.1 | 0.75 | 1.10 | 0.48 | −0.61, 1.3 | −0.35, 1.2 | −1.7, 2.8 | .01 | .02 | .00 |
DAU vs. CML-ND at T1 | 0.60 | 0.17 | −1.5 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 1.0 | 1.27 | 0.47 | −1.52 | −0.35, 1.5 | −0.54, 0.87 | −3.6, 0.49 | .03 | .00 | .04 |
CML vs. DAU at T2 | −1.3 | −1.0 | −.87 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 2.1 | −2.8** | −2.3** | −0.41 | −2.2, −0.36 | −1.9, −0.13 | −5.1, 3.4 | .12 | .08 | .00 |
CML vs. CML-ND at T2 | 0.03 | −0.07 | −0.37 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 2.0 | 0.08 | −0.15 | −0.19 | −0.84, 0.90 | −0.99, 0.85 | −4.2, 3.6 | .00 | .00 | .00 |
DAU vs. CML-ND at T2 | 1.3 | 0.97 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 2.1 | 2.93** | 2.01* | 0.24 | 0.41, 2.2 | 0.01, 1.9 | −0.36, 4.6 | .13 | .07 | .00 |
CML vs. DAU at T3 | −1.4 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 1.6 | −3.52** | −1.18 | 0.32 | −2.2, −0.60 | −1.2, 0.30 | −2.6, 3.6 | .18 | .02 | .00 |
CML vs. CML-ND at T3 | −0.47 | −0.27 | −1.3 | 0.43 | 0.37 | 1.6 | −1.09 | −0.71 | −0.79 | −1.3, 0.39 | −1.0, 0.48 | −4.6, 2.0 | .02 | .01 | .01 |
DAU vs. CML-ND at T3 | 0.93 | 0.17 | −1.8 | 0.46 | 0.39 | 1.4 | 2.04* | 0.43 | −1.27 | 0.02, 1.9 | −0.61, 0.94 | −4.6, 1.0 | .07 | .00 | .03 |
IC1: T1, T2 × CML, DAU | −1.0 | −1.3 | 2.9 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 2.0 | −2.23** | −2.70** | 1.50 | −1.9, −0.11 | −2.3, −0.34 | −0.99, 6.9 | .08 | .11 | .04 |
IC2: T1, T2 × CML, CML-ND | −0.33 | −0.50 | 0.90 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 1.7 | −0.93 | −1.07 | 0.52 | −1.1, 0.38 | −1.4, 0.44 | −2.6, 4.4 | .01 | .02 | .00 |
IC3: T1, T2 × DAU, CML-ND | 0.70 | 0.80 | −2.0 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 2.0 | 1.57 | 1.72 | −1.03 | −0.19, 1.6 | −0.13, 1.7 | −6.0, 1.9 | .04 | .05 | .02 |
IC4: T2, T3 × CML, DAU | −0.13 | 0.60 | −1.4 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 1.5 | −0.33 | 1.45 | −.94 | −0.95, 0.68 | −0.23, 1.4 | −4.3, 1.5 | .00 | .03 | .02 |
IC5: T2, T3 × CML, CML-ND | −0.50 | −0.20 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 1.4 | −1.62 | −0.57 | 0.67 | −1.1, 0.12 | −0.91, 0.51 | −1.8, 3.7 | .04 | .01 | .01 |
IC6: T2, T3 × DAU, CML-ND | −0.37 | −0.80 | 2.3 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 1.5 | −0.97 | −2.06* | 1.53 | −1.1, 0.39 | −1.6, −0.02 | −0.72, 5.3 | .02 | .07 | .04 |
Note. Details of contrasts for hurricane/flood-related threat perceptions and for mother variables are available by request from Jonathan S. Comer. Coping and media literacy-no discussion (CML-ND) mothers received coping and media literacy (CML) training but were not permitted to discuss the clip with their child between Time 2 (T2) and Time 3 (T3). DV1 = terrorism threat perception (societal); DV2 = terrorism threat perception (personal); DV3 = state anxiety; IC = interaction contrast; DAU = discussion as usual; T1 = Time 1.
dfError = 58 for all t tests in table.
p < .05.
p < .017 (alpha-adjusted family-wise error rate).