Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jan;15(1):59–66.

Table 3.

Median, prevalence and adjusted prevalence ratio of non-persistent pharmacy fill adherence score by Morisky aMedication Adherence Scale category.

Pharmacy fill adherence
method
Morisky Medication Adherence Scale Category (score range)
Low (<6) Medium (6 to <8) High (8) p-trend
CSA
Median (25th – 75th percentile) 0.66 (0.56 - 0.72) 0.88 (0.76- 0.93) 0.94 (0.89 - 0.97) <0.001
Non-persistent CSA (<0.8)
Prevalence, % 88 31 8 <0.001
Prevalence ratio* (95% CI) 6.89 (2.48 - 19.1) 2.58 (1.08 - 6.17) 1.00 (ref) <0.001
MPR
Median (25th – 75th percentile) 0.65 (0.58 - 0.79) 0.89 (0.72 - 0.97) 0.98 (0.86 - 1.00) 0.001
Non-persistent MPR (<0.8)
Prevalence, % 75 31 14 0.002
Prevalence ratio* (95% CI) 5.22 (1.88 - 14.5) 2.31 (0.94 - 5.66) 1.00 (ref) 0.001
CMG
Median (25th – 75th percentile) 0.43 (0.29 - 0.52) 0.13 (0.09 - 0.31) 0.09 (0.04 - 0.20) 0.002
Non-persistent CMG (>0.2)
Prevalence, % 100 35 24 <0.001
Prevalence ratio* (95% CI) ---¥ 1.14 (0.74 - 1.77) 1.00 (ref) 0.0755
*

Adjusted for age, race and gender

¥

Prevalence ratio could not be calculated as the prevalence of non-persistent CMG is 100%

CSA - Continuous, single -interval measures of medication availability, MPR - Medication possession ratio, CMG - Continuous, multiple-interval measures of medication gaps

Ref- Reference category; CI- Confidence interval