Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 17;90(3):468–476. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27371

TABLE 3.

Differential effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and safflower oil (SAF) on total and central adipose mass and lean mass1

Diet period 1
Diet period 2
Baseline (week 0) ΔWeeks 0–16 Baseline (week 20) ΔWeeks 20–36 P for trend2 P for comparison of treatments3
Body weight (kg) 0.032
 SAF 99.16 ± 3.29 −0.11 ± 0.55 97.18 ± 4.14 0.90 ± 0.79 0.415
 CLA 98.86 ± 4.13 −1.25 ± 0.71 98.78 ± 3.30 −0.86 ± 0.59 0.024
BMI (kg/m2) 0.000
 SAF 36.3 ± 1.2 0.1 ± 0.2 36.4 ± 1.4 0.5 ± 0.2 0.054
 CLA 37.1 ± 1.4 −0.5 ± 0.2 36.4 ± 1.2 −0.4 ± 0.2 0.002
Adipose tissue (g) 0.074
 SAF 42,994 ± 2272 80 ± 667 43,203 ± 2877 135 ± 906 0.849
 CLA 44,656 ± 2872 −1076 ± 849 42,150 ± 2281 −1591 ± 721 0.019
Trunk adipose tissue (g) 0.039
 SAF 24,391 ± 1227 −1203 ± 852 25,680 ± 1674 −1943 ± 1267 0.042
 CLA 25,506 ± 1655 1075 ± 1184 23,587 ± 1267 314 ± 942 0.361
Lean tissue (g) 0.193
 SAF 45,149 ± 1615 1402 ± 594 46,390 ± 2046 654 ± 808 0.043
 CLA 46,489 ± 2040 −412 ± 756 46,513 ± 1625 599 ± 642 0.851
Waist circumference (cm) 0.904
 SAF 111.3 ± 2.3 −1.0 ± 0.7 110.8 ± 2.9 1.0 ± 1.0 0.949
 CLA 112.0 ± 2.9 −0.7 ± 0.9 110.1 ± 2.3 0.6 ± 0.7 0.915
Waist-hip ratio 0.190
 SAF 0.91 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.00 0.92 ± 0.02 −0.01 ± 0.01 0.874
 CLA 0.90 ± 0.02 0.01 ± 0.01 0.91 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.01 0.084
Sagittal abdominal diameter (cm) 0.449
 SAF 27.3 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0.4 27.6 ± 0.9 0.7 ± 0.5 0.239
 CLA 27.7 ± 0.8 0.3 ± 0.5 27.0 ± 0.7 −0.2 ± 0.4 0.900
Triceps skinfold thickness (mm) 0.629
 SAF 41.7 ± 1.8 0.2 ± 1.0 40.8 ± 2.3 0.8 ± 1.4 0.550
 CLA 41.3 ± 2.2 −0.6 ± 1.2 41.7 ± 1.8 0.5 ± 1.0 0.940
Subscapular skinfold thickness (mm) 0.184
 SAF 45.9 ± 1.7 −3.5 ± 1.2 43.2 ± 2.3 1.5 ± 1.8 0.366
 CLA 43.1 ± 2.2 0.7 ± 1.6 42.1 ± 1.8 1.4 ± 1.4 0.328
1

All values are means ± SEMs, pooled across SAF and CLA groups. In this crossover study, 55 women began supplementation with either SAF or CLA for 16 wk for diet period 1 (weeks 0–16) and diet period 2 (weeks 20–36). Thirty-five women completed all 36 wk. The results were derived from tests for orthogonal contrasts used in the mixed-effects model.

2

Within-diet treatment of both diet periods (final – initial value).

3

Difference of effects of diet treatments (SAF compared with CLA).