Table 6.
Haemodynamics understanding.
| Question/Answers | Number of participants (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Did you have difficulty with the technical concepts (boundary conditions, wall shear stress, etc.)? | ||
| Yes | 7 | (19) |
| No | 28 | (78) |
| n.a. | 1 | (3) |
|
| ||
| Are the results from this software realistic? | ||
| Yes | 13 | (36) |
| Not sure | 21 | (58) |
| No | 0 | (0) |
| n.a. | 2 | (6) |
|
| ||
| Is current evidence sufficient to justify a role for haemodynamics in the pathogenesis of aneurysms? | ||
| No | 1 | (3) |
| Not sure | 15 | (43) |
| Yes | 17 | (48) |
| n.a. | 2 | 6 |
|
| ||
| Were you previously aware of the use of CFD to predict the risk of rupture in intracranial aneurysms? | ||
| No | 15 | (42) |
| Yes | 18 | (50) |
| n.a. | 3 | (8) |
|
| ||
| If you see a publication on computational predictions for IA in a peer-reviewed journal, will you read it? | ||
| No | 3 | (8) |
| Yes | 30 | (84) |
| n.a. | 3 | (8) |