Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 19.

Published in final edited form as: Fungal Genet Biol. 2008 Jan 26;45(6):861–877. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.01.001

Fig. 4 — Vacuolar morphology was visualized by FM4-64 staining (A). A 10 μm bar is shown in either white or black. Thin-section electron microscopy images are shown in (B). A solid arrowhead is used to designate the vacuole. In either set of images, no major differences in vacuolar morphology were seen between the URA3-complemented wild-type strain THE1-CIp10 and the tetR-VPS1 strain, with or without doxycycline.

Fig. 4 — Vacuolar morphology was visualized by FM4-64 staining (A). A 10 μm bar is shown in either white or black. Thin-section electron microscopy images are shown in (B). A solid arrowhead is used to designate the vacuole. In either set of images, no major differences in vacuolar morphology were seen between the URA3-complemented wild-type strain THE1-CIp10 and the tetR-VPS1 strain, with or without doxycycline.