Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 29;6:48. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-48

Table 2.

Logistic regression models showing whether intervention students maintained or increased their advantage, relative to controls in terms of performance of each skill to mastery/near mastery level (MNM) at follow-up; controlling for MNM level at end of intervention, gender and grade

Skills 95% CI

Beta SE Wald P Odds ratio Lower Upper
Catch Intercept 1.80 .57 9.86 .002
MNM in 2000 .40 .45 .77 .380 1.49 .61 3.61
Grade -1.23 .54 5.24 .022 .29 .10 .84
Gender .97 .48 4.01 .045 2.63 1.02 6.78
Intervention status 1.71 .53 10.39 .001 5.51 1.95 15.55

Throw Intercept 2.36 .42 31.92 .000
MNM in 2000 .47 .39 1.47 .226 1.60 .75 3.41
Grade -2.13 .36 34.27 .000 .12 .06 .24
Gender -.21 .32 .00 .948 .98 .53 1.83
Intervention status -.84 .33 6.57 .010 .43 .23 .82

Kick Intercept 1.86 .42 19.40 .000
MNM in 2000 .66 .37 3.07 .080 1.93 .93 4.00
Grade -2.69 .37 52.78 .000 .07 .03 .14
Gender .09 .32 .07 .787 1.09 .58 2.06
Intervention status -.93 .35 7.05 .008 .39 .20 .78

Jump Intercept 1.07 .37 8.19 .004
MNM in 2000 1.19 .51 5.51 .019 3.27 1.22 8.81
Grade .27 .36 .56 .456 1.31 .64 2.68
Gender .33 .36 .82 .364 1.39 .68 2.84
Intervention status .14 .36 .14 .712 1.14 .56 2.34

Gallop Intercept 2.32 .48 23.29 .000
MNM in 2000 .04 .41 .01 .932 1.04 .46 2.31
Grade -.50 .43 1.37 .242 .61 .26 1.40
Gender -.20 .41 .24 .623 .82 .37 1.82
Intervention status .21 .42 .26 .613 1.24 .55 2.79

Note: Reference categories were: 'Male', 'Yr 10', 'Control' and '0 Skill'