Table 4.
Outcomes | Dual target vs. control | Dual target vs. caregiver only | Caregiver only vs. control |
---|---|---|---|
Caregiver outcomes | |||
Omnibus F-test | F6,110 =2.48; p = .027 | F6,108 = 1.34; p = .248 | F6,109 = 1.66; p = .136 |
CESD | NS | NT | NT |
Burden | NS | NT | NT |
Self-care problems | NS | NT | NT |
Health symptoms | DT > C (p = .012) | NT | NT |
Satisfaction with support | NS | NT | NT |
Social integration | D > C (p = .007) | NT | NT |
Mean caregiver—care-recipient dyad outcomes | |||
Omnibus F-test | F5,111 = 2.30; p = .049 | F5,107 = 2.53; p = .033 | F5,110 = 1.24; p = .294 |
CESD | NS | DT > CG only (p = .014) | NT |
Self-care problems | NS | NS | NT |
Health symptoms | DT > C (p = .002) | DT > CG only (p = .031) | NT |
Satisfaction with support | NS | NS | NT |
Social integration | NS | NS | NT |
Note. NS = Not significant; NT = Not tested because omnibus ANOVA was not significant; CESD = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; DT > C = dual-target condition improved more than control condition; DT > CG only = dual-target condition improved more than caregiver-only condition.