Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 31;4(8):e6838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006838

Table 2. The effect of the sigma virus compared to bacterial and fungal infection on gene expression.

Sigma virus infected flies Bacteria and fungus infected males
Sex Change expression Up-regulateda Down-regulateda No change
Female Up-regulatedb 2 0 38
Down-regulatedb 4 7 67
No change 77 69 3264
Male Up-regulatedb 5 5 230
Down-regulatedb 13 12 277
No change 89 81 3743
Combined Up-regulatedb 7 5 266
Down-regulatedb 14 17 319
No change 93 80 4447

Only genes included in both datasets are shown. There is no significant association between the two datasets in any of the three comparisons (Fisher Exact tests on 2×2 contingency tables of genes showing a significant change in expression).

a

In the list of 400 ‘Drosophila Immune Related Genes’ identified by De Gregorio [28].

b

Significant at P<0.02.