TABLE 3.
Characteristics of Eyes in Which There was Consensus of Disc Change by Photography in the Glaucoma Imaging Longitudinal Study
| Age | Race | Gender | IOP First Photo (mm Hg) |
IOP Second Photo (mm Hg) |
Time Between Photos (mos) |
VF Worse?a | HRT Worse?b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disc worsening | |||||||
| 71 | White | Male | 17 | 21 | 25 | No | No |
| 78 | White | Male | 22 | 22 | 37 | No | Yes |
| 68 | White | Female | 10 | 17 | 41 | No | Yes |
| 67 | White | Male | 11 | 18 | 26 | No | No |
| 60 | White | Male | 15 | 12 | 24 | No | No |
| 69c | South Asian | Male | 18 | 12 | 30 | Possible | Yes |
| Disc improving | |||||||
| 70 | White | Male | 14 | 14 | 24 | No | No, improved |
| 68 | White | Male | 11 | 17 | 35 | No | No |
| 54d | White | Male | 21 | 10 | 32 | No | No |
| 63e | White | Female | 13 | 10 | 22 | Insufficient data | No |
HRT = Heidelberg Retinal Tomography; IOP = intraocular pressure; mos = months; VF = visual field.
a
By glaucoma progression analysis.
b
By confirmed changes in rim area in at least two sectors.
c
Underwent trabeculectomy, revision, and second trabeculectomy between the two photos. All three readers independently judged the discas worse.
d
This eye had a trabeculectomy between the two photographs.
e
A disc hemorrhage was seen on the earlier photo.