Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Pain. 2007 May 23;12(1):104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.04.001

Table 2.

Hierarchical Regression Analysis for the Prediction of PILL Scores

R R2 SE R2 change F change p
Step 1 0.63 0.40 26.81 0.40 92.20 .000
Step 2 0.68 0.46 25.90 0.06 3.47 .001

B SE β Tolerance
Step 1
 PASS physiological 1.41 0.18 0.46c 0.66
 BDI somatic 1.79 0.42 0.24c 0.66

Step 2
 PASS physiological 1.86 0.21 0.61c 0.42
 BDI somatic 1.76 0.55 0.24b 0.36
 PASS fearful appraisal −0.86 0.29 −0.24b 0.29
 BDI cognitive 0.65 0.43 0.13 0.30
 STAXI state −0.54 0.34 −0.09 0.57
 STAXI trait 0.53 0.36 0.08 0.67
 MPQ total 0.19 0.12 0.08 0.75
 PASS cognitive −0.24 0.27 −0.08 0.25
 PASS escape/avoidance −0.25 0.21 −0.07 0.61
 CSQ-R catastrophizing 0.17 0.37 0.04 0.32

Note 1. A Tolerance < .20 indicates potential multicollinearity; Since multiple subscales from the same measure were entered as predictors in the regression analyses, high intercorrelation among subscales from the same measure would be expected.

Note 2. When the regression analysis was performed using the sensory and affective subscales from the MPQ, in place of the MPQ total score, the same constellation of significant predictors resulted in the final equation.

b

p<.01

c

p<.001