Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Nov;40(11):1863–1872. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181801d40

Table 1.

The effects of 16-weeks of either no exercise training (Control, n = 7), low-intensity exercise training (LIET, n = 11), or high-intensity exercise training (HIET, n = 9)on the parameters associated with the metabolic syndrome.

NOET LIET HIET
Pretraining Posttraining Pretraining Posttraining Pretraining Posttraining ANCOVA, p-value
(Treatment, Time, Interaction)
Waist Circumference, cm 98.2 ± 10.0 97.5 ± 8.0 103.8 ± 10.6 102.6 ± 10.4 103.7 ± 16.8 98.1 ± 13.3*¥Ψ (0.036, 0.020, 0.055)
Fasting Blood Glucose, mg.dL-1 107.7 + 14.6 110.4 + 16.6 106.7 + 13.5 104.0 + 10.8 110.2 + 20.6 113.8 + 26.0 (0.675, 0.066, 0.658)
HDL-C, mg.dL-1 42.7 ± 6.7 45.7 ± 9.1 44.6 ± 6.6 49.0 ± 10.4 50.9 ± 10.7 52.1 ± 9.1 (0.181, 0.085, 0.233)
Triglycerides, mg.dL-1 187.3 ± 77.0 191.5 ± 97.3 241.9 ± 202.4 213.8 ± 135.8 152.1 ± 43.9 126.7 ± 40.0 (0.245, 0.175, 0.552)
Systolic Blood Pressure, mm Hg 129 ± 12 130 ± 11 135 ± 17 124 ± 10*,¥ 124 ± 16 123 ± 15 (0.207, 0.087, 0.046)
Diastolic Blood Pressure, mm Hg 75 ± 7 76 ± 7 82 ± 12 78 ± 10 76 ± 8 74 ± 8 (0.706, 0.469, 0.549)

Two-way, mixed-effects analysis of variance of covariance with repeated measures (ANCOVA) was employed to examine mean differences in pre-to posttraining values, with the baseline values serving as the covariate (see methods for details). For all analyses, linear contrasts of the means were constructed to test our a priori hypotheses. Fisher’s Restricted Least Significant Differences criterion was utilized to maintain the a priori type I error rate of 0.05.

*

Significantly different from baseline (p <0.05)

¥

Significant treatment effect (post — pre) compared with NOET (p <0.05)

Ψ

Significant treatment effect (post — pre) compared with LIET (p <0.05)