Table 2. A sample section of the data table generated by the tracking system diagramed in Figure 3a,b.
Site addressc | Pick-up date | Intake date | Item description | Testing location | Urgency | Comments | Swab taken? | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBI | 10/9/2001 | 10/9/2001 | Envelope (Westchester County) | NYCPHL | No | |||
Hospital A | 10/10/2001 | 10/10/2001 | Blood culture | NYCPHL | Stat | No | ||
Hospital B | 10/8/2001 | 10/10/2001 | Request for bacterial culture identification | NYCPHL | Stat | No | ||
FBI | 10/10/2001 | 10/10/2001 | Petri dish | NYCPHL | No | |||
NYPD | 10/11/2001 | One express-mail envelope sealed in plastic, addressed to United Nations | NYCPHL | High | No | |||
FBI | 10/11/2001 | 10/11/2001 | Plastic bag with white powder; business card. | Wadsworth | Low | not enough info | No | |
FBI | 10/11/2001 | 10/11/2001 | Plastic bag containing one envelope with white powder. | Wadsworth | Low | not enough info | No |
aFrom left to right are fields for responder or site of response, site address, date of pick-up, date of intake, bag contents, location of testing, comments, priority, swab taken (yes, no), and patient (if clinical sample). This database allowed the managers to check the progress of sampling and keep track of the “who, what, where, and when” of the samples. b FBI, Federal Bureau of Investigation; NYCPHL, New York City Public Health Laboratory; NYPD, New York City Police Department; Stat, highest priority for laboratory testing. cMasked for security purposes.