Table 2.
Usability ratings and short-term psychosocial outcomes from “+CLICK” (N = 32).
| Usability ratings | n (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | ||||
| Kind of easy to use | 3 (9.4) | |||
| Very easy to use | 27 (84.4) | |||
| Work pace | ||||
| Just right | 30 (93.8) | |||
| Credibility | ||||
| Information could be trusted | 30 (93.8) | |||
| Information was correct | 31 (96.9) | |||
| Information will help to make healthy choices | 30 (93.8) | |||
| Understandability | ||||
| Words were understandable | 28 (87.5) | |||
| Acceptability | ||||
| Liked the overall application | ||||
| Liked a little | 4 (12.5) | |||
| Liked a lot | 26 (81.2) | |||
| Liked the pictures and colors | ||||
| Liked a little | 4 (12.5) | |||
| Liked a lot | 25 (78.1) | |||
| Liked the cartoons | ||||
| Liked a little | 7 (21.9) | |||
| Liked a lot | 24 (75.0) | |||
| Liked the videos | ||||
| Liked a little | 6 (18.8) | |||
| Liked a lot | 24 (75.0) | |||
| Liked the name “+CLICK” | ||||
| Liked a little | 8 (25.0) | |||
| Liked a lot | 20 (62.5) | |||
| Motivation | ||||
| Would use +CLICK again | 28 (87.5) | |||
| Would tell others about +CLICK | 27 (84.4) | |||
| Short-term psychosocial outcomesa | Pre-test mean (SD) | Post-test mean (SD) | P valueb | |
| Importance of waiting to have sex, or to have sex again | 8.1 (2.24) | 9.0 (1.64) | .067 | |
| Self-efficacy to wait to have sex, or to have sex again | 7.8 (2.80) | 8.8 (1.89) | .071 | |
| Importance of condom use | 9.8 (0.57) | 9.8 (0.70) | .889 | |
| Self-efficacy for condom use | 9.1 (2.03) | 9.6 (1.25) | .008 | |
a
Matching pre- and post-tests missing for four participants (n = 28); range of possible scores, 0–10.
b
Wilcoxon signed rank test.