Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2008 May 20;42(2):869–878. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.011

Table 4.

Reaction times on CalCAP tasks (milliseconds) in SN, HIV subjects and HIV subjects who used cocaine

Tasks SN Controls (n=14) HIV (n=24) HIV+Coc (n=11) P-values (F or t-values and % change)

Trend test df= (2, 46) SN vs. HIV df = 36 SN vs. HIV+Coc df = 23 HIV vs. HIV+Coc df = 33

Simple reaction 293±31 325±86 350±79 0.03* (F=1.9) ns 0.01 (t=2.5; 19.5%) ns
Choice reaction("7") Single digit recognition 388±30 408±47 417±55 0.04* (F=1.4) ns ns ns
1-back cued response (“X” only after “A”) 388±55 461±122 452±113 ns 0.02 (t=2.1; 18.8%) 0.04 (t=1.9; 16.5%) ns
Sequential # (1-back) 503±119 614±125 606±99 ns 0.006 (t=2.7; 22.3%) 0.02 (t=2.3; 20.5%) ns
Sequential # (1-increment) 531±105 638±112 651±118 0.002* (F=4.9) 0.003 (t=2.9; 20.2%) 0.008 (t=2.6; 22.6%) ns
Sequential # (2-back) 670±156 843±175 817±165 ns 0.002 (t=3.0; 25.9%) 0.02 (t=2.2; 21.8%) ns
Degraded words with distracters 517±60 596±133 537±73 ns 0.02 (t=2.1; 15.1%) ns ns
Response reversal / visual scanning 640±140 703±124 733±114 0.03* (F=1.8) ns 0.05 (t=1.7; 14.5%) ns
Form discrimination 675±111 854±159 774±127 ns 0.0004 (t=3.7; 26.5%) 0.03 (t=2.0; 14.7%) ns

P values for the trend tests are predictions for the values to be SN > HIV > HIV+Coc (asterisks indicate significance after correction for multiple comparisons)

P values for the post hoc unpaired t-tests predicts SN>HIV, SN>HIV+Coc or HIV>HIV+Coc.

Percentages are calculated as the corresponding deviations from SN controls