Table 2.
Tibia model
|
Femur model
|
||||||||||||
All Groups |
Females
|
Males
|
All Groups |
Females
|
Males
|
||||||||
SEM model paths: model A | Young | Older | Young | Older | Young | Older | Young | Older | |||||
Bone | ← | Loading | (b) | 0.215 | 0.127 | 0.246 | 0.211 | 0.129 | 0.049 | 0.230 | −0.066 | −0.010 | 0.267 |
Bone | ← | Locomotion | (d) | −0.055 | 0.000 | 0.191 | −0.131 | −0.152 | −0.061 | −0.020 | 0.055 | 0.028 | −0.163 |
Muscle | ← | Loading | (a) | 0.255 | 0.004 | 0.039 | −0.075 | 0.037 | 0.258 | 0.008 | 0.041 | −0.076 | 0.038 |
Muscle | ← | Locomotion | (c) | 0.059 | 0.107 | 0.066 | 0.134 | −0.007 | 0.059 | 0.104 | 0.065 | 0.135 | −0.005 |
Bone | ← | Muscle | (e) | 0.365 | 0.274 | 0.110 | 0.267 | 0.260 | 0.073 | 0.224 | 0.232 | 0.246 | 0.114 |
Muscle | ← | Length | 0.123 | 0.303 | 0.228 | 0.379 | 0.163 | 0.122 | 0.301 | 0.230 | 0.379 | 0.161 | |
Muscle | ← | Weight | 0.611 | 0.295 | 0.380 | 0.303 | 0.340 | 0.612 | 0.300 | 0.378 | 0.303 | 0.339 | |
Bone | ← | Length | −0.080 | 0.036 | 0.153 | −0.014 | 0.143 | −0.051 | 0.178 | 0.251 | 0.130 | −0.056 | |
Bone | ← | Weight | 0.293 | 0.112 | 0.192 | 0.254 | −0.006 | 0.260 | 0.125 | 0.044 | 0.360 | 0.289 | |
Quadrants | ← | Length | 0.157 | 0.122 | −0.057 | 0.046 | 0.165 | 0.157 | 0.123 | −0.056 | 0.044 | 0.163 | |
Rears | ← | Length | 0.017 | 0.057 | 0.044 | 0.026 | 0.043 | 0.018 | 0.058 | 0.047 | 0.024 | 0.041 | |
Quadrants | ← | Weight | −0.162 | −0.153 | −0.047 | −0.268 | −0.342 | −0.162 | −0.154 | −0.047 | −0.266 | −0.341 | |
Rears | ← | Weight | −0.048 | −0.047 | −0.081 | −0.195 | −0.228 | −0.048 | −0.048 | −0.082 | −0.193 | −0.227 | |
Loading | ↔ | Locomotion | 0.360 | 0.370 | 0.395 | 0.297 | 0.316 | 0.360 | 0.370 | 0.395 | 0.297 | 0.316 |
Standardized regression weights for pooled data and young and old female and male cohorts. Shading indicates paths that were significant at p ≤ 0.05; bold italics indicates paths that were suggestive at p ≤ 0.10. Paths a–e are indicated on Fig. 1. and were allowed to be free across groups.