Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jan;29(1):70–77. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21648

Table 3.

Comparison between controls and RRMS age and group means of various MRI-xderived parameters of the entire caudate (fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity and T2 relaxation time) along with the age linear regression and correlation statistical analysis.

Healthy Adult Controls RRMS p
Age (years) 38.2 ± 11.4 41.9 ± 8.5 0.15
ICV (mL = cm3) 1527.3 ± 137.8 1480.9 ± 132.5 0.17
WBCSFp 10.1 ± 2.8 13.6 ± 4.0 0.0001
CNV (mL) 7.18 ± 0.84 6.1 ± 1.01 0.000016
CNVp=CNV/ICV (x 100%)
rage(p)
0.47 ± 0.04
−0.38 (0.03)
0.41 ± 0.08
−0.29 (0.11)
0.0006
0.70
FA @ CNV
rage(p)
0.139 ± 0.011
0.52 (0.003)
0.152 ± 0.017
0.28 (0.12)
0.001
0.28
Dav (x10−3 mm2 sec−1) @ CNV
rage(p)
0.736 ± 0.023
0.16 (0.38)
0.751 ± 0.031
−0.32 (0.07)
0.02
0.06
T2. (msec) @ CNV
rage(p)
91.8 ± 5.2
0.16 (0.37)
89.4 ± 4.9
0.09 (0.61)
0.05
0.79