Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 9;19(4):263–271. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1114299

Table 1.

Comparison between Patients with and without Sheath Incision


All Patients (n = 55)*
Preoperative Vision > PL−ve (n = 42)*
Group A (Sheath Incised) (n = 33) Group B (Sheath not Incised) (n = 22) Group A (Sheath Incised) (n = 24) Group B (Sheath not Incised) (n = 18)
PL−ve, no perception of light; PL+ve, perception of light.
Age (y): mean (range) 27.3 (6–52) 25 (6–45) 26.5 (6–52) 25.6 (6–45)
Preoperative visual acuity
 • PL−ve 9 4
 • PL+ve 4 2 4 2
 • Hand movements 6 7 6 7
 • 1/60 6 3 6 3
 • 2/60 2 1 2 1
 • 3/60 1 3 1 3
 • 6/60 5 2 5 2
Fracture (optic canal/postorbit)
 • Fracture present 12 10 6 6
 • No Fracture 21 12 18 12
Grade of Injury
 • Grade 2 (no fracture, vision > PL−ve & ≤ 6/60) 14 8 14 8
 • Grade 3 (fracture or PL−ve) 11 7 8 7
 • Grade 4 (fracture & PL−ve) 8 7 2 3
Injury-operation interval (d)
 Median 63 61 67 66.5
*

Two cases excluded from initial data set of 57 because of inadequate length of follow up.

Grade of injury is based on fractures of the optic canal or posterior orbit and the worst recorded vision.