Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 9;19(4):263–271. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1114299

Table 3.

Percentage Improvement among Patients in Groups A and B*

Group A (n = 33)
Group B (n = 22)
Statistical Significance (Mann-Whitney Test)
Proportion Improving Mean Improvement (%) Proportion Improving Mean Improvement (%)
vn, vision; PL−ve, no perception of light; PL+ve, perception of light.
Preop vn = PL−ve (n = 13) 1/9 1.6 0/4
Preop vn > PL−ve (n = 42) 20/24 46.4 14/18 32.8 0.10
Subsequent Analysis Restricted to Patients with Residual Vision before Surgery (vn > PL−ve)
n = 24 n = 18
Fracture (optic canal/postorbit)
 • Fracture present (n = 12) 4/6 30.3 4/6 29.0 0.87
 • No fracture (n = 30) 16/18 51.8 10/12 34.6 0.07
Grade of injury
 • Grade 2 (n = 22)(no fracture, vn > PL−ve & ≤ 6/60) 13/14 57.5 8/8 43.0 0.10
 • Grade 3 (n = 15) (fracture or PL−ve) 6/8 35.2 5/7 28.2 0.60
 • Grade 4 (n = 5) (fracture & PL−ve) 1/2 13.5 1/3 16.1
*

Group A patients had optic canal decompression supplemented with incision of the nerve sheath; group B patients had canal decompression alone and no incision of the nerve sheath.

Categorization of patients into vn = PL−ve and Vn > PL−ve is based on the preoperative vision after medical treatment and spontaneous improvement. Patients with persistent PL−ve despite medical treatment and spontaneous therapy are considered an extremely poor prognostic group.

Grade of injury is based on fractures of the optic canal or posterior orbit and the worst recorded vision.