TABLE 1.
Epoch (ms) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interaction | 250–600 | 250–300 | 300–350 | 350–400 | 400–450 | 450–500 | 500–550 | 550–600 |
Midline electrodes | ||||||||
P × T | < .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | < .05 | > .10 | < .05 | < .05 |
P × T × E | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 |
Medial-lateral electrodes |
||||||||
P × T | < .05 | > .10 | > .10 | < .10 | < .05 | < .05 | < .05 | < .05 |
P × T × E | < .05 | < .01 | < .001 | < .01 | < .05 | < .10 | < .05 | > .10 |
P × T × H | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | < .10 | > .10 |
P × T × E × H | < .05 | > .10 | < .05 | > .10 | < .05 | < .05 | < .01 | < .10 |
Lateral-lateral electrodes |
||||||||
P × T | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | < .10 | > .10 | < .10 | < .10 |
P × T × E | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 |
P × T × H | < .05 | > .10 | > .10 | < .10 | < .05 | > .10 | < .10 | > .10 |
P × T × E × H | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 | > .10 |
Right-hemisphere centroparietal sites (Cz, Pz, C4, P4) |
||||||||
P × T × Anxiety × Avoidance | < .05 | < .01 | < .01 | > .10 | < .10 | > .10 | > .10 | < .10 |
T × Anxiety × Avoidancea | < .05 | < .05 | < .01 | < .05 | < .10 | < .05 | < .10 | > .10 |
Note. The table reports p values produced from a series of general linear models examining the effects of prime type (P; attachment vs. nonattachment), target type (T; acceptance vs. rejection), electrode (E), and hemisphere (H) on event-related potential (ERP) amplitudes during the entire 250- to 600-ms epoch and individual 50-ms epochs during this window. Boldface highlights p values less than .10. The results for the individual 50-ms epochs were highly consistent with those for the entire 250- to 600-ms epoch.
The p values in this row are from analysis of the attachment-prime condition only.