Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Nov;15(11):2107–2114. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0351

Table 1. PAI1 expression and overall survival in three breast cancer cohorts.

Cohort n Hazard ratio
(95% confidence interval)
P
UCSF
 All cases 117 1.46 (1.07-1.98) 0.016
 Subgroup
   LN cases 50 1.14 (0.52-2.47) 0.746
   LN+ cases 67 1.53 (1.06-2.20) 0.023
   ER cases 43 1.65 (1.06-2.58) 0.026
   ER+ cases 74 1.33 (0.86-2.07) 0.202
 Multivariate*
   All cases 114 1.37 (0.98-1.93) 0.068
van de Vijver
 All cases 295 1.31 (1.09-1.58) 0.003
 Subgroup
   LN cases 151 1.55 (1.21-1.99) 0.001
   LN+ cases 144 1.13 (0.84-1.52) 0.427
   ER cases 69 1.08 (0.85-1.38) 0.508
   ER+ cases 226 1.34 (0.99-1.83) 0.062
   High risk 180 1.21 (1.01-1.45) 0.042
 Multivariate
   All cases 295 1.18 (0.98-1.41) 0.083
Miller
 All cases 234 0.95 (0.72-1.24) 0.699
 Subgroup
   LN cases 149 0.83 (0.55-1.26) 0.381
   LN+ cases 77 0.99 (0.70-1.39) 0.957
   ER cases 30 1.93 (0.63-5.88) 0.250
   ER+ cases 200 0.90 (0.68-1.19) 0.454
 Multivariate§
   All cases 223 0.95 (0.72-1.24) 0.708

NOTE: Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed for overall survival using PAI1 expression as a normalized continuous variable. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals are for 1-unit increase in the standard deviation of the log 2 expression of PAI1 (range = 1.11-8.33).

*

Multivariate analyses were adjusted for LN status, tumor size, age at diagnosis, and ER status.

Cases with a poor 70-gene prognostic signature (33).

Multivariate analyses were adjusted for LN status and ER status.

§

Multivariate analyses were adjusted for LN status, age at diagnosis, tumor size, and ER status.