Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct-Dec;2(4):148–153. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.36548

Table 1.

Patient gender- and age-based comparisons of esophageal Doppler monitoring versus pulmonary artery catheter bias characteristics

Patient group N Number of measurements Bias ± S.D.a 95% C.I.b S.E.M.c
 Men (M) C.O.d 11 115 -1.01 ± 1.89 -4.79 to 2.77 0.177
 Women (F) C.O. 4 40 -2.63 ± 2.16 -6.94 to 1.68 0.341
Difference (F vs M)f -1.61 -2.33 to −0.902 P<0.001
 Men (M) S.V.e 11 115 -9.12 ± 15.5 -40.1 to 21.9 1.52
 Women (F) S.V. 4 40 -31.3 ± 20.7 -72.7 to 10.1 3.44
Difference (F vs M)f -22.2 -15.7 to −28.6 P<0.001
 Age <40 y/o 5 92 -1.30 ± 1.86 -5.02 to 2.42 0.194
 Age 40 y/o 10 63 -1.63 ± 2.37 -6.37 to 3.11 0.298
Difference (<40 y/o vs 40 y/o)f 0.332 -0.340 to 1.00 P=0.330
a

S.D. = Standard deviation,

b

C.I. = Confidence interval,

c

S.E.M. = Standard error of the mean,

d

C.O. = Cardiac output,

e

S.V. = Stroke volume,

f

Student's t-test