Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 16;53(6):605–615. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep039

Table 3.

Potential predictor variables of HPD use and differences in reporting by method

Variable All Survey, HPD use >50% % Activity card, HPD use >50% % Difference (survey activity) %
n %
All 251 100 55 41 14
Site
    Site A 33 13 70* 42 28
    Site B 31 12 58 32 26
    Site C 25 10 40 24 16
    Site D 37 15 68 43 25
    Site E 31 12 68 58 10
    Site F 38 15 53 45 8
    Site G 29 12 31 45 −14
    Site H 27 11 41 30 11
Trade
    Cement mason 6 2 83* 50* 33
    Plumber 16 6 81 50 31
    Electrician 22 9 73 32 41
    Operating engineer 7 3 43 14 29
    Pipefitter 16 6 63 50 13
    Sheet metal 14 6 57 57 0
    Ironworker 17 7 41 6 35
    Carpenter 113 45 45 41 4
    Laborer 40 16 60 50 10
Years in construction
    <10 years 83 33 55 39 16
    10–20 years 89 35 58 43 15
    >20 years 77 31 48 39 9
Education
    <HS 18 7 28* 33 −5
 HS, GED 145 58 54 42 12
    >HS, trade school 87 35 60 40 20
Hearing status
    Good 108 43 62 47* 15
    Fair 120 48 50 38 12
    Poor 19 8 47 16 31
Percent shift above 85 dBA
    <25% 102 41 62 31 31
    25–50% 104 41 53 50 3
    >50% 45 18 42 40 2

χ2: *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01.