Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 30;24(21):2453–2459. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn438

Table 3.

Comparison of the average training results for the str2 and near-backbone-11 alphabets for two architectures specified in Table 1 trained for 50, 150 and 250 epochs

epochs 50 150 250
str2 mean bits saved
IDaaHr 0.84 1.02 1.08
IDGaaH13 0.94 1.10 1.16
near-backbone-11 mean bits saved
IDaaHr 0.05 0.47 0.50
IDGaaH13 0.33 0.51 0.56

The architecture with the guide sequence (IDGaaH13) is consistently superior at all stages of training.