Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2009 Oct;77(1):97–110. doi: 10.1002/prot.22421

Table III. Properties of designs on X-ray vs. NMR templates.

Method avg. minimum NMR − Xray energy differencea Native-sequence recovery SASApack


X-ray NMR Bestb NMR Average X-ray NMR Besta NMR Average
buried C-RELAX 6.7 ± 7.9 52.9 ± 14.2 49.9 ± 19.7 36.3 ± 13.0 2.7 ± 1.5 2.5 ± 1.8 4.2 ± 1.6
R-RELAX 6.6 ± 6.8 56.5 ± 13.7 58.2 ± 15.7 45.6 ± 11.4 2.1 ± 1.8 2.0 ± 1.6 4.5 ± 1.8
R-ITER 5.6 ± 7.1 70.2 ± 14.7 61.8 ± 13.1 53.2 ± 13.1 0.7 ± 2.0 0.8 ± 1.0 3.2 ± 1.6

surface C-RELAX 2.13 ± 4.1 19.9 ± 8.8 28.5 ± 9.1 16.2 ± 6.5 1.07 ± 0.5 0.80 ± 0.6 1.52 ± 0.7
R-RELAX 0.17 ± 7.9 22.2 ± 11.1 34.7 ± 9.8 20.8 ± 6.7 0.81 ± 0.6 0.49 ± 0.6 1.42 ± 0.6
R-ITER 1.12 ± 3.5 30.7 ± 10.1 38.3 ± 9.6 24.1 ± 7.4 0.39 ± 0.6 0.19 ± 0.6 1.00 ± 0.6
a

The average of the difference {(lowest-energy-NMR-design) − (X-ray design)} over all structure pairs.

b

“NMR Best” refers to the best native-sequence recovery or SASApack score among NMR designs with energies less than 2 kcal/mol above the X-ray design.