Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2009 Oct;77(1):97–110. doi: 10.1002/prot.22421

Table V. Proportion of structure pairs for which at least one NMR design with X-ray-like SASApack and native-sequence recoverya also had a low design energy.b.

Method Rosetta CHARMM FoldEF
C-RELAX 0.42 (8/19) 0.74 (14/19) 0.53 (10/19)
R-RELAX 0.27 (4/15) 0.73 (11/15) 0.40 (6/15)
R-ITER 0.14 (3/21) 0.62 (13/21) 0.38 (8/21)
a

Native-sequence recovery and SASApack scores within the range {X-ray value plus/minus one standard deviation} were considered X-ray-like.

b

A low design energy was an energy lower than 2 kcal/mol above the X-ray design energy.