Skip to main content
. 2002 Aug;8(8):802–807. doi: 10.3201/eid0808.010418

Table 3. The effect of antibiotic treatment as risk factor for vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Cases
(%) Control (%) Unadjusted effect Adjusted for explanatory modela Adjusted for model
and other antibioticsa
Antibiotic agent
(233)
(647)
OR
p
value
OR
(95% CI)
p
value
OR
(95% CI)
p
value
Penicillins 67 (29) 134 (21) 1.5 0.04 .99 (.63 to 1.6) 0.97 1.0 (.64 to 1.7) 0.86
β-lactam-inhibitor combination 49 (21) 98 (15) 1.5 0.07 .94 (.6 to 1.5) 0.78
Cephalosporins 104 (45) 248 (38) 1.2 0.28 1.5 (1.0 to 2.4) 0.048
Third generation 69 (30) 97 (15) 2.6 <0.001 2.8 (1.7 to 4.5) <0.001 2.8 (1.7 to 4.8) <0.001
Vancomycin (p.o.) 4 (1.7) 7 (1.1) 1.2 083 1.0 (.25 to 4.2) 0.96
Vancomycin (i.v.) 67 (29) 121 (19) 1.7 0.016 1.4 (.89 to 2.3) 0.19 .99 (.57 to 1.7) 0.98
Metronidazole (p.o.) 13 (5.6) 23 (3.6) 1.5 0.29 1.0 (.42 to 2.5) 0.97
Metronidazole (i.v.) 47 (20) 57 (9) 2.5 <0.001 2.3 (1.3 to 3.9) 0.003 2.1 (1.2 to 3.7) 0.008
Clindamycin 20 (8.6) 51 (7.9) 1 0.9 1.5 (.76 to 2.8) 0.26 1.1 (.55 to 2.3) 0.76
Quinoloneb 48 (21) 68 (11) 2 0.005 1.6 (.94 to 2.6) 0.086 1.5 (.85 to 2.6)b 0.17b
Imipenem 19 (8.2) 27 (4.2) 1.7 0.12 1.3 (.61 to 2.9) 0.47 1.2 (.52 to 2.8) 0.66

aAdjusted for the explanatory model detailed in Table 2.
b When included as a continuous variable (number of days of treatment with quinolone) OR=1.03, p=0.05.
OR, odds ratio; p.o., orally; i.v., intravenously.