Table 2.
Comparisons between parameter estimates from two models: the block on the left fits the model assuming independence between the fields (i.e. τNF = 0), while the block on the right corresponds to a dependent model that estimates τNF
Independent model (τNF = 0) |
Dependent model (τNF estimated) |
||||||
Estimates | 2.5% | 97.5% | Estimates | 2.5% | 97.5% | True value | |
β | 5.24 | 4.65 | 6.29 | 5.31 | 5.22 | 5.42 | 5.00 |
τN | 1.00 | 0.77 | 1.34 | 1.12 | 0.83 | 1.60 | 1.00 |
GSD(τN) | 2.72 | 2.40 | 3.18 | 2.88 | 2.49 | 3.54 | 2.72 |
τF | 0.61 | 0.47 | 0.82 | 0.69 | 0.50 | 0.97 | 0.64 |
GSD(τF) | 2.18 | 1.98 | 2.47 | 2.29 | 2.03 | 2.68 | 2.23 |
τNF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.63 | 0.41 | 0.96 | 0.5 |
log(![]() |
4.49 | 2.50 | 6.42 | 4.53 | 1.82 | 7.25 | 4.72 |
log(![]() |
3.22 | 1.68 | 4.78 | 3.20 | −0.26 | 6.60 | 4.20 |
β | Interzonal airflow rate (m3 min−1) | ||||||
τN, τF | Variance for measurement error at near and far field (log scaled) | ||||||
τNF | Covariance between near and far field for measurement error (log scaled) | ||||||
GSD(τN) | Geometric standard deviation for measurement error at near field | ||||||
![]() ![]() |
Steady-state concentration at near and far field (mg m−3) |
The simulated data set was generated using true parameter values indicated in the rightmost column.