Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 29;19(12):2020–2025. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn427

Table 2.

Comparison of pCR rates, with 95% confidence intervals (lower panel), among the regimens according to hormone receptor status

Regimen Overall P HR+ P HR− P
3-wP/FAC versus wP/FAC 28% versus 44% 0.05 19% versus 25% 0.39 40% versus 65% 0.07
3-wP/FAC versus H + 3-wP/FEC 28% versus 54% 0.003 19% versus 47% 0.01 40% versus 61% 0.09
wP/FAC versus H + 3-wP/FEC 44% versus 54% 0.24 25% versus 47% 0.04 65% versus 61% 0.46
Overall
HR+
HR−
Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI
Treatment groups
    H + 3-wP/FEC 0.539 0.436 0.643 0.465 0.316 0.614 0.609 0.468 0.750
    wP/FAC 0.444 0.322 0.567 0.250 0.100 0.400 0.645 0.477 0.814
    3-wP/FAC 0.277 0.149 0.404 0.185 0.039 0.332 0.400 0.185 0.615
    Grand total 0.447 0.378 0.516 0.324 0.233 0.414 0.577 0.479 0.676

pCR, pathologic complete response; HR, hormone receptor (estrogen or progesterone receptor); 3-w, 3-weekly; P, paclitaxel; FAC, fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide; FEC, fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide; H, trastuzumab; CI, confidence interval.