Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 29;19(12):2020–2025. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn427

Table 3.

Comparison of rates of pCR/RCB-I (pCR plus near-pCR), with 95% confidence intervals (lower panel), among the regimens according to hormone receptor status

Regimen Overall P HR+ P HR− P
3-wP/FAC versus wP/FAC 41% versus 57% 0.08 34% versus 47% 0.21 50% versus 68% 0.16
3-wP/FAC versus H + 3-wP/FEC 41% versus 72% <0.0001 34% versus 73% 0.002 50% versus 72% 0.07
wP/FAC versus H + 3-wP/FEC 57% versus 72% 0.03 47% versus 73% 0.02 68% versus 72% 0.44
Overall
HR+
HR−
Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI
Treatment groups
    H + 3wP/FEC (0) 0.719 0.626 0.812 0.721 0.587 0.855 0.717 0.587 0.848
    wP/FAC (1) 0.571 0.449 0.694 0.469 0.296 0.642 0.677 0.513 0.842
    3-wP/FAC (2) 0.404 0.264 0.545 0.333 0.156 0.511 0.500 0.281 0.719
    Grand total 0.598 0.530 0.666 0.539 0.442 0.636 0.660 0.566 0.754

pCR, pathologic complete response; HR, hormone receptor (estrogen or progesterone receptor); 3-w, 3-weekly; P, paclitaxel; FAC, fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide; H, trastuzumab; FEC, fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide; CI, confidence interval.