Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 27;9(4):735–749. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn006

Table 3.

Analysis of the children participating in CHS. We show parameter estimates (standard errors) using maximum likelihood on the original cohort (OC) and maximum conditional likelihood on the outcome-dependent sample (ODS). The OC pertains to 1286 subjects, and the ODS pertains to the 698 subjects who exhibited response variation among all subjects. We also display the observed ρx for each covariate

Covariate ρx OC ODS
Intercept 1 − 1.235 (0.079) − 1.476 (0.202)
Asthmatic 1 0.112 (0.091) 0.291 (0.182)
    p = 0.15 0.110 0.225
    p = 0.23 0.093 0.191
    p = 0.30 0.085 0.175
Within-subject, 4-day average ozone (per 10 ppb) 0 − 0.007 (0.046) 0.037 (0.049)
    p = 0.15 0.045 0.047
    p = 0.23 0.046 0.048
    p = 0.30 0.047 0.049
Asthmatic × within-subject ozone 0 0.037 (0.064) 0.039 (0.061)
    p = 0.15 0.077 0.076
    p = 0.23 0.065 0.064
    p = 0.30 0.060 0.059
Between-subject, 4-day average ozone (per 10 ppb) 1 0.048 (0.057) 0.113 (0.080)
Thirty-day average ozone (per 10 ppb) 0.72 − 0.165 (0.06) − 0.231 (0.067)
Male 1 − 0.468 (0.079) − 0.563 (0.171)
Noncaucasian 1 − 0.377 (0.116) − 0.377 (0.245)
Grade 7 (versus grade 4) 1 0.183 (0.081) 0.008 (0.168)
Secondhand smoke exposure 1 − 0.039 (0.081) 0.104 (0.167)
Dependence model parameters
    γ 0.603 (0.110) 0.603 (0.115)
    log(σ) − 1.427 (0.848) − 1.427 (0.627)

Standard error estimates from our feasibility check, where p is the presumed proportion of asthmatic children in the OC.