Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 1993 Spring;16(1):9–23. doi: 10.1007/BF03392605

Separating discriminative and function-altering effects of verbal stimuli

Henry D Schlinger Jr
PMCID: PMC2733573  PMID: 22478128

Abstract

Ever since Skinner's first discussion of rule-governed behavior, behavior analysts have continued to define rules, either explicitly or implicitly, as verbal discriminative stimuli. Consequently, it is not difficult to find, in the literature on rule-governed behavior, references to stimulus control, antecedent control, or to rules occasioning behavior. However, some verbal stimuli have effects on behavior that are not easily described as discriminative. Such stimuli don't evoke behavior as discriminative stimuli, but rather alter the functions of other stimuli in a manner analogous to operant and respondent conditioning. Hence, this type of control has been called function altering. Any known stimulus function (e.g., evocative, or [conditioned] reinforcing or punishing functions) can apparently be altered by such function-altering stimuli. Describing these stimuli as discriminative stimuli obscures their possible function-altering effects and consequently may retard inquiry into them. This paper encourages behavior analysts to begin separating the discriminative and function-altering effects of verbal stimuli and suggests that by doing so, behavior analysts may better understand what may be most unique about these stimuli. Results from several experiments, especially those in which children served as subjects, are analyzed. Finally, some speculations are offered concerning the genesis of function-altering stimuli.

Keywords: rules, rule-governed behavior, function-altering stimuli, contingency-specifying stimuli, discriminative stimuli

Full text

PDF
9

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AYLLON T., AZRIN N. H. REINFORCEMENT AND INSTRUCTIONS WITH MENTAL PATIENTS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:327–331. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alessi G. Models of proximate and ultimate causation in psychology. Am Psychol. 1992 Nov;47(11):1359–1370. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.11.1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baer R. A. On the functional role of the verbalization in correspondence training procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Winter;21(4):345–356. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baxter G. A., Schlinger H. Performance of children under a multiple random-ratio random-interval schedule of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):263–271. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blakely E., Schlinger H. Rules: Function-altering contingency-specifying stimuli. Behav Anal. 1987 Fall;10(2):183–187. doi: 10.1007/BF03392428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boren J. J., Devine D. D. The repeated acquisition of behavioral chains. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):651–660. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brownstein A. J., Shull R. L. A rule for the use of the term, "Rule-governed behavior". Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;8(2):265–267. doi: 10.1007/BF03393158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Buskist W. F., Bennett R. H., Miller H. L. Effects of instructional constraints on human fixed-interval performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Mar;35(2):217–225. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cerutti D. T. Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Mar;51(2):259–276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deacon J. R., Konarski E. A., Jr Correspondence training: an example of rule-governed behavior? J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Winter;20(4):391–400. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Devany J. M., Hayes S. C., Nelson R. O. Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):243–257. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayes S. C., Kohlenberg B. S., Hayes L. J. The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):119–137. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matthews B. A., Shimoff E., Catania A. C., Sagvolden T. Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):453–467. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Michael J. Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):149–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Michael J. The discriminative stimulus or S(D). Behav Anal. 1980 Spring;3(1):47–49. doi: 10.1007/BF03392378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  17. Palmer D. C., Donahoe J. W. Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. Am Psychol. 1992 Nov;47(11):1344–1358. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.11.1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pouthas V., Droit S., Jacquet A. Y., Wearden J. H. Temporal differentiation of response duration in children of different ages: developmental changes in relations between verbal and nonverbal behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):21–31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schlinger H., Blakely E. Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;10(1):41–45. doi: 10.1007/BF03392405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sidman M. Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Mar;14(1):5–13. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1401.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wulfert E., Dougher M. J., Greenway D. E. Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):489–504. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES