Table IV.

Correlation coefficients among physical activity, self-efficacy, functional limitations and the environment for the sample of women with MS

Variable	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
Actigraph	—
EXSE	0.34**	—
LL-FDI	−0.46**	−0.29**	—
Density	−0.10	0.09	0.18*	—
Land use	0.20**	0.04	−0.09	0.27**	—
Access	0.18*	0.09	−0.12	0.39**	0.59**	—
Walking/cycling	0.08	0.05	−0.09	0.26**	0.24**	0.37**	—
Aesthetics	0.06	0.04	−0.01	0.01	0.03	0.13	0.24**	—
Traffic safety	−0.10	−0.02	0.00	−0.09	0.09	0.18*	0.27**	0.23**	—
Crime safety	−0.11	−0.01	−0.05	−0.08	−0.02	0.04	0.17*	0.42**	0.49**	—
Satisfaction	0.06	0.07	−0.13	0.08	0.05	0.19*	0.11	0.42**	0.41**	0.48**	—

SPS = Social Provisions Scale; Density = Neighborhood Environment Walkability Survey-Residential Density Subscale; Land use = Neighborhood Environment Walkability Survey-Land Use Mix-Diversity Subscale; Access = Neighborhood Environment Walkability Survey-Access to Services Subscale; Walking/cycling = Neighborhood Environment Walkability Survey-Walking/Cycling Facilities Subscale; Aesthetics = Neighborhood Environment Walkability Survey-Aesthetics Subscale; Traffic safety = Neighborhood Environment Walkability Survey-Safety from Traffic Subscale; Crime safety = Neighborhood Environment Walkability Survey-Safety from Crime Subscale; Satisfaction = Neighborhood Environment Walkability Survey-Neighborhood Satisfaction Subscale. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.