TABLE 2.
Exposure, location | Scope and endpoint | Result | References |
Drinking water, Taiwan | Eighty-four villages 1968–1982 mortality | SMR 1.7 for men and 2.3 for women* | Chen et al., 1985 |
Forty-two villages 1973–1986 mortality | All ages, dose-response for men* | Chen et al., 1988 | |
Forty-two villages 1973–1986 mortality | > 20 years, dose-response for both sex* | Wu et al., 1989 | |
Three hundred and fourteen townships 1972–1983 mortality | Association of As for liver cancer* | Chen and Wang, 1990 | |
Multistage model analysis | Liver cancer mortality, men > women* | Chen et al., 1992 | |
Above data analysis | Dose-response for liver cancer* | Morales et al., 2000 | |
Four towns 1971–1994 mortality versus Taiwan | SMR 1.98 for men and 2.14 for women* | Tsai et al., 1999 | |
1971–2000 mortality after end of exposure | Reduction of liver cancer in women* | Chiu et al., 2004 | |
Drinking water, China | Inner Mongolia 1971–1993 mortality | Excess liver cancer mortality (rank #2)* | Luo et al., 1995 |
Drinking water, Bangladesh | 65,800 residents, age-sex adj. mortality | Lifetime liver cancer mortality doubled* | Chen and Ahsan, 2004 |
Drinking water, Japan | Four hundred and fifty-four resident cohort, 1959–1992 mortality | Excess mortality from liver cancer* | Tsuda et al., 1995 |
Drinking water, Argentina | Twenty-six countries 1986–1991 mortality | A modest trend for liver cancer mortality | Hopenhayn-Rich et al., 1988 |
Burning arsenic coal, China | Guizhou, 1970–1980 mortality | Increased liver cancers* | Zhou et al., 2002 |
Significantly different from unexposed population, p < 0.05.