Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 23;25(17):2194–2199. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp383

Table 2.

Comparison of Swift and GAPipeline 1.3.2 Image analysis when used in conjunction with the Swift basecaller, as for Table 1

GAPipeline 1.3.2 + Swift
Swift yield
Tile no. Total reads Dups. Rem. PF Err. (%) Inc. (%)
1 112 925 112 503 92 345 1.12 9.05
21 108 588 108 190 91 022 1.12 6.48
41 101 574 101 171 85 281 1.15 3.63
61 104 237 103 782 87 455 1.24 5.48
81 112 546 112 122 82 588 1.36 19.72