Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2007 Dec;9(4):375–391. doi: 10.1080/14616730701711581

Table VII.

Means and standard deviations for sibling differences on scale scores by attachment concordance.

Discordant Concordant


n M SD n M SD t p
Scales for experience
 Loving-M 73 2.43 1.65 52 1.54 1.42 3.20 <.01
 Loving-F 72 2.16 1.49 51 1.42 1.28 2.96 <.01
 Rejection-M 66 2.25 1.58 52 1.52 1.54 2.51 .01
 Rejection-F 64 2.59 1.66 50 1.76 1.49 2.81 .01
 Involving/reversing-M 64 .95 1.42 51 1.24 1.39 −1.08 .28
 Involving/reversing-F 71 .54 1.00 52 .62 1.22 −0.38 .70
 Pressure to achieve-M 69 .68 1.31 50 .77 1.34 −0.37 .71
 Pressure to achieve-F 68 .65 1.15 51 .67 1.15 −0.10 .92
 Neglect-M 66 .91 1.31 50 .85 1.31 0.23 .82
 Neglect-F 63 2.01 1.91 50 1.65 2.00 0.94 .35
Scales for states of mind
 Idealizing-M 72 3.68 1.66 53 1.25 1.18 9.57 <.001
 Idealizing-F 71 3.16 1.89 53 1.63 1.36 5.24 <.001
 Involving anger-M 73 .48 1.15 53 .34 .85 0.03 .98
 Involving anger-F 72 .67 1.27 52 .66 1.19 0.79 .43
 Derogation-M 72 .41 .88 53 .34 .95 0.41 .68
 Derogation-F 71 .28 .78 52 .12 .44 1.40 .17
Scales for overall states of mind
 Overall derogation 72 .64 1.03 53 .50 1.41 0.58 .56
 Insistence on lack of recall 73 2.47 1.67 53 1.64 1.73 2.67 .01
 Metacognitive processes 73 .46 .69 53 .28 .57 1.60 .11
 Passivity of thought processes 73 1.20 .94 53 1.44 1.24 −1.19 .24
 Fear of loss 50 .49 .80 40 .28 .55 1.46 .15
 Highest score for unresolved loss 63 1.40 1.46 44 1.94 1.52 −1.85 .07
 Coherency of transcript 73 3.01 1.18 53 .93 .80 11.51 <.001
 Coherence of mind 73 2.97 1.24 53 .89 .81 11.84 <.001

Note: Too few cases (n = 6; 3 from discordant sibling pair group and 3 from concordant sibling pair group) for meaningful comparison of highest scores on unresolved trauma. M = mother. F = father.