Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2007 Dec;9(4):375–391. doi: 10.1080/14616730701711581

Table VIII.

Correlations between sibling scale scores by attachment concordance.

Discordant Concordant


n r n r
Scales for experience
 Loving-M 73 −.33* 52 .45***
 Loving-F 72 −.08 51 .46***
 Rejection-M 66 −.02 52 .45***
 Rejection-F 64 −.03 50 .34***
 Involving/reversing-M 64 .17 51 .09
 Involving/reversing-F 71 −.12 52 .06
 Pressure to achieve-M 69 .01 50 .23*
 Pressure to achieve-F 68 .38** 51 .27*
 Neglect-M 66 .15 50 .34**
 Neglect-F 63 .13 50 .15
Scales for states of mind
 Idealizing-M 72 −.74*** 53 .65***
 Idealizing-F 71 −.60*** 53 .65***
 Involving anger-M 73 −.07 53 .29**
 Involving anger-F 72 −.09 52 .16
 Derogation-M 72 −.10 53 .06
 Derogation-F 71 −.06 52 .20
Scales for overall states of mind
 Overall derogation 72 −.08 53 .31**
 Insistence on lack of recall 73 −.31* 53 .05
 Metacognitive processes 73 −.09 53 .16
 Passivity of thought processes 73 .05 53 .05
 Fear of loss 50 .22 40 .01
 Highest score for unresolved loss 63 .46** 44 .23
 Coherency of transcript 73 −.74*** 53 .76***
 Coherence of mind 73 −.75*** 53 .76***

Note: Too few cases (n = 6; 3 from discordant sibling pair group and 3 from concordant sibling pair group) for meaningful comparison of highest scores on unresolved trauma. M = mother. F = father.