Table 2.
Comparison of RV function and wall motion abnormalities reported by the core laboratories for 2D echocardiogram, MRI and angiography in studies adequate for interpretation of RVEF, FAC and wall motion
# | % | ||
---|---|---|---|
Structural abnormalities by imaging | |||
Global function | |||
Severe RV dilatation and reduced RVEF** | |||
MRI; RVEF less than 45% | 20/56* | 36 | |
Echocardiogram; RV FAC<26% | 13/85* | 15 | |
Angiogram; severely reduced global function | 17/81 | 21 | |
Mild RV global dilatation and/or reduced RVEF*** | |||
MRI; RVEF 45 – 51% | 18/56* | 32 | |
Echocardiogram; RV FAC 26 – 32% | 24/85* | 28 | |
Angiogram; mildly reduced global function | 25/81 | 31 | |
Right ventricular wall motion abnormalities | |||
Severe hypokinesis, akinesis, dyskinesis, aneurysm or diastolic bulging ** | |||
MRI | 24/88 | 27 | |
Echocardiogram | 44/93 | 47 | |
Angiogram | 28/81 | 35 | |
Mild hypokinesis *** | |||
MRI | 21/88 | 24 | |
Echocardiogram | 24/93 | 26 | |
Angiogram | 28/81 | 35 |
Excluding missing data
# of imaging studies including views adequate for RVEF or FAC measurements
Major task force criteria
Minor task force criteria