Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Free Radic Biol Med. 2008 Nov 12;46(4):462–470. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.10.049

Table 1.

Echocardiographic analysis of study groups

Parameter Control TNF TNF+ APO TNF+ Temp
IVSD (mm) 1.32 ± 0.04 1.71 ± 0.04* 1.56 ± 0.03 1.42 ± 0.02
IVSS (mm) 2.69 ± 0.13 2.67 ± 0.14 2.68 ± 0.05 2.56 ± 0.03
LVD (mm) 6.51 ± 0.07 7.72 ± 0.11* 7.34 ± 0.10 6.85 ± 0.04,§
LVS (mm) 2.92 ± 0.16 4.67 ± 0.06* 4.12 ± 0.01 3.37 ± 0.08,§
PWD(mm) 1.41 ± 0.02 1.71 ± 0.03* 1.50 ± 0.03 1.45 ± 0.01
PWS (mm) 2.53 ± 0.09 2.58 ± 0.09 2.44 ± 0.14 2.54 ± 0.14
FS% 55.19 ± 2.42 34.20 ± 1.31* 40.86 ± 0.76 50.79 ± 1.12
HR 352.25 ± 13.70 342.20 ± 14.73 350.40 ± 15.3 357.0 ± 14.8
Tei 0.37 ± 0.02 0.51 ± 0.02* 0.49 ± 0.04 0.38 ± 0.02,§

Echocardiographic analysis revealed significantly greater left ventricular diastolic (LVD) and systolic (LVS) dimensions in TNF-treated animals. TNF treatment also decreased fractional shortening (FS%) and increased Tei index. Cotreatment with Tempol prevented these changes. IVSD, intraventricular septal thickness at end diastole; IVSS, intraventricular septal thickness at end systole; PWD, posterior wall thickness at end diastole; PWS, posterior wall thickness at end systole; HR, heart rate. Values are expressed as means ± SEM.

*

p< 0.05, control vs TNF.

p< 0.05, TNF vs TNF+ APO.

p< 0.05, TNF vs TNF+ Temp.

§

p< 0.05, TNF+ APO vs TNF+ Temp.