Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2009 Nov 15;30(14):2231–2247. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21222

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of pairwise interactions of 1200 conformers in Barnase (1A2P chain A) at εp of 4. ΔGES is calculated with only the interacting conformers present (Fig. 1a) whereas ΔGM uses the standard multiconformation boundary conditions for calculating pairwise interactions (Fig. 1b, Table 1). ΔGAi,BjM versus ΔGAi,BjES for (a) 1613 charge–charge and (c) 9679 charge–dipole interactions and (e) 16641 dipole–dipole interactions. Lines show slope 1 and best-fit lines through the points. ΔGAi:BjC eq. (6) versus ΔGAi,BjES for (c) charge–charge and (c) charge–dipole interactions. Dipole–dipole interactions are generally small and no corrections are used. Line of slope 1 is shown.