Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Apr;21(4):713–724. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21052

Table 2.

Coordinates of Peak Activations and F Values for Regions Demonstrating a Significantly Different BOLD Response for Targets as a Function of Subject Gender, Stimulus Gender, Subject Gender × Stimulus Gender, and Subject Gender × Hierarchy Cue

Region L/R BA mm3 x y z
Subject Gendera
Inferior occipital gyrus R 18 1081 31 −98 −16
L 17/18 756 −29 −101 −15
Fusiform L 18 579 −44 −80 −19
Middle temporal gyrus L 21 539 −39 7 −41
Lingual gyrus/Declive L 18 232 −11 −81 −18
Stimulus Genderb
Middle occipital gyrus R 19 8210 27 −90 4
Lingual gyrus L 18 6382 −20 −98 −10
Inferior temporal gyrus R 37 2614 52 −60 −13
VLPFC (inferior frontal
 gyrus)
R 47 920 27 25 −12
Posterior cingulate R 29 865 8 −43 7
Caudate L 712 −9 −10 22
Precuneus R 31 255 27 −69 21
Inferior frontal gyrus R 38 247 48 21 −14
VLPFC (inferior frontal
 gyrus)
L 47 230 −34 32 −13
Subject Gender × Stimulus Gender
Middle temporal gyrus R 39 1412 57 −72 23
Subject Gender × Hierarchy Cue
Cuneus R 17 812 20 −90 6
Middle temporal gyrus L 21 721 −64 −8 −8
Uncus R 28 581 20 2 −30

All activations significant at p < .005 and corrected at p < .05 for multiple comparisons.

a

All regions show greater activity for male subjects than female subjects with the exception of lingual gyrus/declive.

b

All regions show greater activity for female stimuli than male stimuli.