Table 3.
Course structure
| Course structure | Grade |
n | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ″A″ | ″B″ | ″C″ | ″D″ | ″F″ | ″W″ | ||
| Preworkshop (% each grade) | 9.97 | 17.96 | 23.93 | 13.12 | 22.94 | 12.08 | 2127 |
| Workshop (% each grade) | 13.55 | 26.98 | 24.42 | 13.30 | 14.58 | 7.16 | 782 |
| Difference | 3.59 | 9.02 | 0.49 | 0.18 | −8.37 | −4.92 | 2909 |
| % Change | 36.00 | 50.24 | 2.06 | 1.39 | −36.46 | −40.73 | |
| Significance | Two-way Pearson χ2 = 61.85, df = 5, p < 0.001 | ||||||
Grade distributions of students in preworkshop and workshop semesters are shown followed by the difference in percentages, and the percentage of change. The significance of a two-way contingency table analysis of grades × course structure is reported in the last row.