Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2009 Oct 1;125(7):1685–1691. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24477

Table 3.

Association between +331G/A PR polymorphism and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer by postmenopausal hormone (PMH) status and type of PMH used

PMH use status GG AG+GG
Cases, n (%) Controls, n (%) OR (95%CI)1 Cases, n (%) Controls, n (%) OR (95%CI) P - int2
Never 258 (83%) 607 (92%) 1.00 (ref) 53 (17%) 50 (8%) 2.57 (1.64-4.02)
Past 336 (90%) 574 (91%) 1.00 (ref) 39 (10%) 54 (9%) 1.23 (0.77-1.97)
Current 804 (89%) 891 (90%) 1.00 (ref) 97 (11%) 97 (10%) 1.14 (0.84-1.56)
 Estrogen alone 373 (89%) 445 (91%) 1.00 (ref) 47 (11%) 45 (9%) 1.49 (0.95-2.36)
 Estrogen + progesterone 355 (90%) 355 (90%) 1.00 (ref) 38 (10%) 41 (10%) 0.78 (0.47-1.27)
 Other 76 (86%) 91 (89%) 1.00 (ref) 12 (14%) 11 (11%) 1.50 (0.48-4.68)
0.02
1

Unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age, date blood draw, age at menarche, age at menopause, age at first birth/parity, BMI at age 18, weight gain since age 18, history of benign breast disease, first-degree family history of breast cancer, and alcohol consumption.

2

P - int = P for interaction based on likelihood ratio test comparing unconditional logistic regression models with and without interaction terms between PMH use status (never, past, current) and genotype (GG, AG+GG)(degrees of freedom = 2).