Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2009 Aug 6;11(15):3170–3173. doi: 10.1021/ol901104a

Table 1.

Optimization of thiazolidine exchange reaction of 3a.

graphic file with name nihms132576t1.jpg

entry Reaction conditionsa time (h) 3a/3b ratiob 2 (%)c
1 pH 4, rt 24 45/55 3
2 pH 4, rt 48 44/56 2
3 pH 4, rt 72 46/54 10
4 pH 5, rt 24 71/29 5
5 pH 5, rt 48 68/32 10
6 pH 5, rt 72 52/48 9
7 pH 6, rt 24 96/4 0
8 pH 6, rt 48 97/3 0
9 pH 6, rt 72 90/10 0
10 pH 7, rt 72 98/2 0
11 pH 4, 35 °C 24 45/55 18d
12 pH 4, 35 °C 48 35/65 16e
a

The starting concentration of each component was 1 mM; the reaction mixture was stirred in a buffered acetate solution at pH 4 and pH 5, and in a phosphate solution at pH 6 and pH 7.

b

The ratio was determined by 1H NMR.

c

The mass balance was quantitative

d

Total yield 3a + 3b (64%).

e

Total yield 3a + 3b (49%).