Table 2.
Hydroxyl Adducts (in PBS) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adducts | g | an (G) | aβ-H (G) | Relaxation Coefficientsa |
||
α | β | γ | ||||
4a-OHa | 2.0054 | 13.8 | 12.7 | 1.82 | 0.41 | 0.46 |
4b-OH | 2.0053 | 13.8 | 12.5 | 1.77 | 0.38 | 0.38 |
Superoxide Adducts (in DMSO)b | ||||||
axis | g | an(G) | aβ-H (G) | Correlation time (ns) | ||
4a-OO− | x | 2.0089 | 2 | 12 | 1.74 (4a) | |
or | y | 2.0085 | 3 | 10 | ||
4b-OO− | z | 1.992 | 31 | 11 | 1.61 (4b) |
, where Γ is the linewidth, α, β, and γ are relaxation coefficients and MI is the z component secondary quantum number for the nuclear-spin angular momentum for N atom (MI= 1).
The anisotropic g’s, hfsc’s and correlation times were calculated as follows: From the isotropic signal, the line width variation was interpreted via a relaxation model assuming a rhombic g- and hyperfine tensors, where the anisotropy was partially averaged out by the isotropic rotational tumbling. The spectrum fit was optimized for both the anisotropic tensor elements and the correlation time.