. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Jun;16(3):469–474. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.469

Table 1.

Experiment 1 accuracy and decision criterion estimates across groups and tests

	Strict-Strict-No FB-No FB				Lax-Lax-No FB-No FB

	TEST1	TEST2	TEST3	TEST4	TEST1	TEST2	TEST3	TEST4
Hit	.71(.10)	.68(.13)	.67(.17)	.63(.17)	.76(.07)	.78(.07)	.78(.08)	.74(.08)
False Alarm	.15(.08)	.17(.08)	.20(.11)	.20(.09)	.20(.07)	.26(.10)	.31(.17)	.29(.13)
A_z	.83(.10)	.83(.06)	.81(.10)	.79(08)	.85(.04)	.81(.08)	.79(.10)	.82(.08)
c	.26(.31)	.26(.30)	.20(.36)	.26(.35)	.06(.21)	−0.07(.24)	−0.12(.32)	−0.02(.25)
Proportion of Manipulated Trials	20.5(6.76)	21.3(8.16)	N/A	N/A	14.8(4.23)	18.9(6.76)	N/A	N/A

Note: Values in parentheses indicate standard deviations. FB = feedback