Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med. 2008 Jan 18;25(1):12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2007.12.001

Table 1.

NTCP and TCP model parameters in calculating NTCP and TCP values for all investigated treatment plans and in risk-adaptive optimization as its input parameters instead of physical dose.

Structures D50 [Gy] Gamma(γ50) or m & n References
Organs-at-risk (OAR)
Bladder 80.0 m = 0.11 & n = 0.5 Kutcher and Burman [29]
Unspecific Pelvic Normal tissue 55.0 m = 0.13 & n = 0.15 Kutcher and Burman [29]
Rectum (1) 81.9 m = 0.19 & n = 0.23 Rancati et al [30]
Rectum (2)* 75.7 m = 0.14 & n = 0.24 Rancati et al [30]
Rectum (3)* 55.9 m = 0.16 & n = 1.03 Tucker et al [31]
Tumor Subvolume classification
Intermediate risk (M) 72.8 γ50 = 2 Levegrün et al [25]
Very high risk (H+) 82.3 γ50 = 2
Selected D50 and γ50 Combination
H+-M22 Nodule : Very high risk (H+), γ50 = 2 rPTV :Intermediate risk (M), γ50 = 2

Abbreviations: D50 = the dose yielding a 50% dose-response for a specific end point to either normal tissue complications or tumor control, γ50 = the normalized dose-response gradient, m = the parameter is related to the slope of the dose-response curve (m=1/2πγ50), n = the volume effect (cf. no volume effect has been assumed for individual normal tissue voxels when optimizing risk-adaptive optimization [5]),

*

= They were added to minimize NTCP model parameter dependency when calculating NTCP values (no use in an optimization process for risk-adaptive optimization).