Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Hosp Infect. 2009 Mar 17;72(1):57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.01.016

Table III.

Crude and adjusted hazard risks for recent tuberculin skin test conversion after the implementation of administrative M. tuberculosis infection control measures (2002–2003)

Characteristics Crude risk (95% CI) Adjusted riska (95% CI)
Overall
 1998–2001 1 1
 2002–2003 0.46 (0.23–0.89) 0.24 (0.10–0.54)
Sex
 Male 1 1
 Female 1.26 (0.63–2.53) 1.17 (0.53–2.56)
Occupation
 Administrative clerk 1 1
 Physician 1.90 (0.60–6.04) 1.85 (0.49–6.99)
 Nurse 2.52 (1.05–6.00) 3.97 (0.95–10.61)
 Social worker 0.72 (0.88–5.86) 0.76 (0.09–6.48)
 Laboratory/radiology technician 1.91 (0.94–7.40) 1.63 (0.36–7.33)
 Housekeeper 1.77 (0.56–5.59) 1.79 (0.55–5.83)
Work location
 Others 1 1
 Outpatient clinic 1.36 (0.30–6.14) 0.54 (0.10–2.87)
 Clinical ward 2.40 (1.08–5.34) 2.41 (0.79–7.37)
 Intensive care unit 2.52 (0.31–6.83) 2.01 (0.54–7.41)
 Surgery ward 0.65 (0.18–2.34) 0.37 (0.09–1.57)
 Radiology/laboratory/pharmacy 1.81 (0.57–5.68) 1.51 (0.41–5.62)
Ward with respiratory isolation room
 No 1 1
 Yes 1.32 (0.61–2.87) 0.65 (0.26–1.62)
BCG scar
 No 1 1
 Yes 1.00 (0.47–1.15) 0.78 (0.35–1.77)
Exposure to pulmonary TB case in hospital
 No 1 1
 Yes 0.59 (0.28–1.28) 0.31 (0.13–0.73)

CI, confidence interval; BCG, bacillus Calmette–Guérin; TB, tuberculosis.

a

Adjusted for exposure to pulmonary TB case and professional category.